Thoughts along the way...

Author: Eric (Page 4 of 5)

Get Back to Let It Be

Before I started watching, I already knew the ending. But like in so many parts of life, it’s not the destination; it’s the journey. And so it was beginning on Thanksgiving as I settled in over several nights to follow along Peter Jackson’s 8-hour Beatles adventure from January 1969.

It was quite the ride.

I don’t claim to be any special kind of Beatlephile, but I am unabashedly a life-long fan of the fabs, and I’ve been waiting for this with high expectations, as I am also a fan of Jackson’s work. To have access to the entire vault of film and sound recordings made alongside the recording sessions that, ultimately, gave us the last release of the Beatles would be a dream gig. Probably a nightmare, at times, but I can only begin to imagine what it was like working through all those miles of footage…and having seen the final result, I am wondering what kind of gems had to be cut to wrangle this beast into it final form.

Over the years, I have ingested numerous books, articles, radio and television programs and other media about the Beatles. My interest in the group can be blamed almost in whole on my aunt Mary Anne, who exposed me at the youngest age to their music. (She’s also responsible for my Snoopy and Nilsson interests, all of which I can’t thank her enough, really.) Growing up a child of the 60’s, they were damn near omnipresent in my ears, on the radio, even in the classroom, when Mr. B. would visit with his accordion and we’d sit in the circle singing Ob La Di and When I’m Sixty Four and even, at times, Lucy In the Sky With Diamonds.

It was a gas to hear songs on the radio from John, Paul, George, and even Ringo, all now on their own, and demonstrate my musical knowledge to friends who did not know that song was by someone who used to be a Beatle. Over time, we’d compare their independent careers – based mostly on Top-40 radio, so Paul seemed to be the most successful. Naturally, in my group of friends, to be somewhat iconoclastic, I would defend John over Paul, even after he took leave of his music career to focus on fathering and I had to defend his long-worn efforts over the latest and greatest from Paul.

Then, finally, he released his first album in five years, and I was thrilled. I still have the vinyl I bought on December 5, 1980, two and a half weeks after its release.

We know what happened a few days later.

By that time, I had been reading this and that; the rolling stone stories and interviews…the Playboy interview, and a few of the books. I’d managed to see the 1970 version of Let It Be, a film (in my recollection) that was far too dismal to be true. I mean, after the sessions that gave us the album Let It Be, they went back into the studio and gave us Abbey frickin’ Road, a farewell that was a much better gift as their last work, even if the timing of the releases made it seem more penultimate than ultimate.

All of this to say, the story of the Beatles is one with which I feel confident in saying I am quite familiar…and yet…so much over the years was never properly resolved in telling of the end. By most accounts, the sessions in Twickenham, where George famously quit for a few days, were the end of the group. After all, Yoko was there – forever demonized as the catalyst for the split. Of course, very little is made of the fact that Ringo quit the group four months earlier – and stayed away a week longer than George did when he quit – while the sessions that gave us The Beatles were creating more conflict that the Twickenham sessions did.

We weren’t there. We don’t know how they split. Well, we do; there is a timeline, and there is a narrative, but there are so many conflicting stories from the people close the group that have all made it in to this definitive or that definitive version of the story – I’ve lost track. And so many of the stories make the whole John and Yoko story line the reason we don’t have the Beatles today – to which I’ve always called bullshit. (At the risk of digressing too far, it’s worth noting that The Ballad of John and Yoko was recorded four months after the Get Back sessions, and while credited to the group, George was abroad and Ringo was filming The Magic Christian, so John and Paul did it all themselves. There’s a lot of joy on that record.)

At any rate – we weren’t there. And while there is a lot of Beatles history from 1969 we don’t see, Get Back gives us a new look into a part of the year that has been, for more than 50 years, pretty well told.

Or so we thought.

The very first thing we see when watching Get Back (it’s on Disney+ which I’ve kept as a service in anticipation of seeing this) is a notice telling us that what we’re going to experience has been culled from nearly 60 hours of film and 150 hours of audio recordings. Once I read that, I thought crap – we only get to see 8 hours worth… Fortunately, Jackson and crew have done an incredible job of curating this archive for us and creating a story across three installments. I’ll not give a travelogue, other than to say Part 1 is in Twickenham studio and ends as George leaves; Part 2 is the group getting back together and decamping to the basement of their Apple HQ on Savile Row, to be joined by Bill Preston on keys, and Part 3 culminates with the rooftop concert.

Along the way, we get to be the proverbial fly on the wall watching the lads get together each day and make music. Sometimes they experiment with new songs and new sounds. Other times they kick back and play 50s rockers.

How young they looked in this film. The image quality is exceptional, as is the sound, and all throughout I marveled at how good it looked, as if it had been recorded last week. For a very large part of the time, they are just goofing off, playing together, but even when they good off you can see their amazing talent, and then, as I watched, it occurred me: none of them were yet 30, and yet they’d been rocking together as a band, in earnest, for a dozen years.

Also: how tired they looked. On most days, they all display a workman-like mien, coming in at the start of the shift each day to do their job, ply their trade, and lay down some tracks. And while the rooftop concert only yields a handful of songs, by the end of January, 1969, we’ve seen the Beatles create the album Let It Be and get a jumpstart on Abbey Road, plus a glimpse at the solo projects brewing from George’s All Things Must Pass, Paul’s Ram, and John’s Imagine albums.

Get Back is a look with love at the Beatles, from a time that we all thought we knew. But until I saw it with my own two eyes, I never knew that John, Paul, Ringo, and Yoko rocked out in jam sessions – Paul wide-eyed and hooting as he does when he’s in a groove, Yoko ululating in her avant-garde splendor. Yoko wasn’t the only band partner who spent time in the studio during these sessions – it wasn’t the boy’s-only club we thought she broke up from the old, “traditional” narrative.

I am sure that in whittling down the hours and hours (and hours!) of recordings to the mere (!) eight we’re allowed to see, narrative choices were made. Much of the story we knew (at least, thought we knew) is intact. The soundstage, the cameras, the walkout, the move to Apple’s building, Billy, and the rooftop – it’s all there, but presented in a new and more thoughtful manner. Long takes of song fragments are allowed to evolve into the works we’ve come to know. Long dialogues allow us to hear the give and take between the partners, giving us insight into how these songs came to be; and how the band was winding down.

All of this is to say: watch Get Back. If you are a Beatles fan, you’ll better know your band from doing so. If you are not a Beatles fan, you’ll likely come away better knowing why, even today, they are a phenomenon and back on the charts. But one word of warning: this is not something to be binged. I forced myself to watch in chunks. It’s too much to process, all in one setting. It’s like a fine dessert -oh, sure, you could just dig in and eat the whole thing, but it’s better if you take a small slice, savor it, then come back later for more. The good feeling lasts longer, and you don’t overwhelm your senses.

Had the pandemic not set in when it did, it is likely that this would have been a three-plus hour film for release in theaters. Because of COVID, the release was pushed back, and in the interim, the wise decision was allowed to make it longer, in three parts, and, ultimately, better. Well worth the extra I’ve paid monthly to have the Disney+ service.

I’m only giving this two thumbs up because that’s all the thumbs I’ve got.

Money, Money, Everywhere…

An interesting read this morning over the tea and toast from the Chronicle of Higher Education that looks at the astronomical figures that make up the salary line of Div. 1 colleges and universities. Well, not the entire salary picture – my own personal experience has been that most public employees aren’t getting even proportionally outsized salaries. No, those astronomical numbers occur consistently in one department across our nation’s campuses: the athletic department.

Joy Blanchard, an associate professor of higher education at Louisiana State University, calculated the difference between her salary and that of her university’s head football coach at the time, Edward Orgeron … Blanchard wanted to know how long it would take him, at his salary, to earn her salary. The answer? Just 2.6 days.

https://www.chronicle.com/article/colleges-are-paying-big-bucks-for-coaches-heres-what-else-they-couldve-spent-the-money-on

Yes, the story does explain the different pools of money that fund athletics versus the rest of the academic enterprise; it discusses the role of donors to lessen the demand of general funds or tuition revenues to make our sports coaches the highest paid public employees in every state. I get all that.

But I’ve been in higher ed for more than three decades and the reality is that the number of athletics programs that are truly fiscally independent, that don’t exert a downward drag on campus finances is a mere handful.

More often than not, athletics budgets magically show up as “balanced” only because the rest of their host campus foots the bill for additional costs, be they infrastructure (building maintenance, parking structures, silly things like internet, phones, and employer costs for employee health care, workers comp, etc.) or just direct subsidies for academic assistance (often in gated facilities available only to athletic elites, not the general student population who may need them, too…). all the way up to direct repayment of debts incurred because, in many – most – cases the athletics enterprise operates in the red and ultimately the institution is the co-signer on the loan and must make good.

I don’t hate athletics, and have been known to root, root, root for the home teams from time to time, but I find it terribly unsettling where the coach salary arms race has taken us – all of use – in recent years. The numbers we spend in one place versus another say a lot more about our priorities than any W/L columns or championship banners can ever replace.

Arms race, Eric?

Sure. Why not? Kinda reminds me of a bumper sticker…

Beyond Zoom

It’s been 628 days (but who counts these things, right?) since the last time I had a guest in my audio booth talking through the ether with distant broadcasters. The last time I fired up the microphones for real was February 27, 2020, to connect a faculty member from our Marine Mammal Institute with CBC’s Quirks and Quarks program to discuss whale skin care. A bit more than two weeks later, we were shut down by a pandemic.

A lot has changed over this time – 21 months! – and some of those changes are in our booth. Back then, our primary broadcast connection to radio stations was an ISDN line, a 1988 technology standard that allowed for high-quality audio connections. (The codec we used was retired in 2018.) Today, for the first time since we went into remote/lockdown/isolation, I’m staring at the controls of a new IP-based audio codec, watching the virtual meters bounce between my studio and the BBC.

The many technologies that supported our remote operations, Zoom being the 800-lb gorilla in our particular sandbox, transformed the way we did our work – all of us. With a Zoom, Teams, or Skype connection, or any manner of audio-over-IP solutions available to broadcasters, the need for a dedicated facility to provide “broadcast quality” audio became more or less moot. To a point.

It was frustrating to me as a listener during the COVID interregnum. Working from home, I had more opportunities to listen live to my favorite radio programs, and would hear sub-standard audio as a regular feature make it on the air. Even our campus had people on programs via cellphones who once would have been in my booth. At times, the way folks used Zoom to get on the radio made a cell connection seem like pristine audio – why producers would take a laptop computer’s shitty microphone in an echoey room over a cell phone baffled me.

But, as a nod to a step towards a return to what will be closer to normal (even if we don’t fully return to normal as we knew it), today I had someone in my booth talking with the BBC. I have another one booked in two weeks.

We’re back on the air, with our folks sounding like they are in a studio again, instead of at their kitchen table. For this, I am grateful.

Boosted

Got a booster shot today. Between age, underlying conditions, and – I think – my job situation, I checked enough boxes to get through the portal and obtain an appointment. And with that little jab I’m now that much more protected here in the pandemic of the unvaccinated and unmasked.

This one was different than the first two; right now, 12 hours later, my arm hurts like heck. The original doses in the spring didn’t seem to affect me much. Maybe it’s because this time around I’m feeling Moderna in my system. Who knows?

I’m just grateful that I am able to say I have taken active, pro-public health steps and done all I can to protect myself and those around me. This whole pandemic thing is starting to get old…

Leaving was easy.

A recent WaPo article tells us that leaving the facething is “Easier said than done.”

[facething] is bad! Nevertheless, more than 2 billion of us are still there — some reluctantly, some enthusiastically. Because even though the platform is a cesspool of toxicity, there are reasons to stay. Maybe it’s the only way you keep in touch with your aunt. Or find out what’s happening in your hometown. Or catch up with gossip from your high school friends. That’s [facething]’s trap: The emotional connections are inextricable from the algorithm that keeps us clicking against our own best interests.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/leaving-facebook-is-hard/2021/11/10/90172232-40bc-11ec-a3aa-0255edc02eb7_story.html

It’s easier than you think. First, download your activity to your computer. This gives you a copy on your computer of your account activity, including posts and – important for many – the photos you’ve uploaded over the years. Once you have a copy of your old life, you can deactivate or delete your account.

That’s it. Eventually you’ll not miss it.

Go ahead – give it try!

Science Fiction?

I still read science fiction, just not as much as I did when I was young. Science fiction and fantasy books were what kept me distracted in my early years. I don’t know what started me on that track – maybe it was Star Trek, or the pulp anthologies my dad had around the house, but by the time I was in fourth or fifth grade I’d been through a few of the Dune novels and the Foundation trilogy.

Today, those titles are making it big on the big screens and big streams. I might get to see those at some point, though reluctantly. The sci-fi of my youth never translated well to anything on a screen, at least as far as I’ve ever been concerned. (It is an ages-old complaint when any printed works get adapted for a screen…)

Science fiction as a “thing” has been in the news in the past few years, as billionaires have raced to reach space fifty years after we put a man on the moon. For whatever reason, we’re heard a lot about how Musk and Bezos and even the dread Zuckerberg have been at times “inspired” by the science fiction they read in their youth. How we’ve evolved with science fiction: fantastic gadgets from Star Trek become real inventions, like the imagined communicator to the actual flip phone and now to the pocket computer. And how our tech billionaires are continuing that wave of inspired innovations.

But what science fiction were they reading?

Heinlen, Herbert, Asimov, Bradbury, Pohl…I chewed ’em up, burning through the stacks in the “Browse” section of the library. I especially loved anthologies of short science fiction stories. In, out, move on to the next fantastic idea. As a child in the middle of the cold war, the escapism that many of these authors gave us came straight from the nuclear scares of the 1950’s. Who cared about plot development, when you can recycle the same story over an over again on a strange new world?

During the past year or so I dusted off the spines of a few of the anthologies I, for whatever reason I can’t recall, kept on the shelf all these years. In particular, it’s been interesting to re-read a series entitled The Early Asimov (vols. 1 & 2) in which the prolific author regaled the reader with an almost encyclopedic recitation of what he was doing in his life when he wrote his first works and cashed his first checks as a writer. Reading his earliest stories is almost grimace-inducing, but in a sweet way. Perhaps it’s in the prose he prefaces each story with, something to soften the blow – I imagine if I found any copies of the early pulpers John Campbell filled with those and similar stories, I’d be…underwhelmed.

(Full disclosure: I’ve yet to be published, having not even finished a work, so I suppose, perhaps, I could just sit down and shut up!)

What was fascinating to me, though, in re-reading my post-war sci-fi collections to keep the pandemic at bay, was not the curious contraptions and pseudo-science brought to bear on alien worlds, but the curious portraiture of society these stories gave us. Not very many writers would qualify as “woke” these days; then again, consider their audience, and pulp editors like John Campbell shepherded their writers to feed that particular appetite.

I was thinking about this just the other day, and what happened next was kind of bizarre: our good friends at On The Media just ran a lovely story about this very topic. So rather than follow this little rabbit hole of my own commentary, I’ll suggest instead that you take off from here and give their story a listen.

Day 2 – habits are hard to kick

It’s a lazy-ish Sunday, and instead of looking for cupcakes and a movie, I popped open the lappy and started to go to … that site. Muscle memory? Laziness? Upon seeing the login page, I just shook my head. Old habits, especially those habits that are designed to deliver dopamine hits deep inside one’s brain, are hard to kick.

But I caught myself, shamed myself, and moved on to the newspaper site to which I subscribe so I could check the day’s headlines instead. It’s a better way to see what’s happening in the world that … that site.

Leaving the borg (again)

Tonight I once again suspended my activities on a large (anti)social media site. I’ve downloaded my account, so I have all the inanities I’ve posted, photos I seem to only have located therein, etc.

The account is deactivated now. Maybe, after some time has passed, I’ll delete it. Who knows?

It’s been an interesting ride, but I’ve been weaning myself for a few weeks, and I’m ready to go cold turkey again. My big concern is that I don’t know how to reach many of the folks I’ve come to be in touch with via the (anti)social media behemoth because that’s our only connection. But I can’t worry about that too much. I am, as they say, in the book if someone’s looking for me, I am not hiding underground.

Card and letter use via the mail has and will continue to increase. It takes more time, and it feels better to stick an envelop in the box on the corner and wonder what may happen – or not – and not have to worry about the interval before someone presses the “like” button. There’s no instant gratification in slow pace of the mails, and waiting around for such a thing creates its own stress.

What with all the hubbub and hoo-hah about the behemoth in recent weeks, it’s time to go. The technology is not evil, but the folks running the company have proven themselves time and again to unconscionably put their own growth and valuation above the impacts on the communities their product touches.

I hope you might consider joining me out here in the empty, less-connected wasteland of the rest of the internet. At the very least, I encourage you to spend less time on social media than you do now. You’ll be a better person for it. I say this with conviction, as I did this once for the better part of a year, and probably would have continued away from the beast but for the onset of life during a pandemic.

It’s served it’s purpose. It’s played me, I’ve played in it, and it’s time to grow up and move on. In the meantime, watch this space…

Missing my chance…

The facething has been down pretty much all day – since about 8:30 this morning (left coast time). And yet, this space is still working.

I feel like the chance to change the face of social media by replacing it with my own empire is slipping through my fingers. But I had a marvelous tomato sandwich for lunch, so I’ll manage. Somehow.

error screen
Slow day on the facething today…
« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 Blurg.

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑